Sign of the Times: Historic Harvard Endowment Makes First-Ever Allocations to Gold, Bitcoin

Among the most prominent reasons for gold’s impressive run in recent years is the metal’s increasingly enthusiastic embrace by institutions historically disinclined to buying – or buying much of – it.

Take central banks. After long avoiding making meaningful allocations to gold, central banks have remained net purchasers of gold since 2010, when the world was still mired in the depths of the financial crisis. But since 2022, when Russia saw roughly half of its sovereign assets frozen by the West as punishment for Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine, central bank demand for counterparty-risk-free gold demand has remained at or near record levels.

Other historically gold-averse institutional investors, such as asset managers and hedge funds, have been making strategic turns to gold, as well, amid mounting concerns over the degree to which intensifying economic, fiscal and geopolitical uncertainty could diminish the returns of portfolios predominately populated by conventional assets.   

“Uncertainty is at the core of [why] hedge funds are turning to gold,” notes Joseph Cavatoni, senior market strategist at the World Gold Council.

And it seems the enthusiasm of larger investors to utilize alternative assets like gold for the purpose of diversifying their overall holdings is spreading further still…including to one particularly storied portfolio that has never previously owned precious metals: the endowment fund of Harvard University.

Harvard Management Company Embraced High-Profile Alternative Assets With Both Arms Last Quarter

According to its most recent 13F filings with the Securities & Exchange Commission, Harvard Management Company (HMC) – the wholly owned subsidiary of Harvard University charged with managing the endowment – bought 333,000 shares of SPDR Gold Shares (NYSE: GLD), which is the world’s largest and most notable gold-backed exchange-traded fund (ETF). The purchase marked the portfolio’s first-ever allocation to gold…an allocation valued at around $105 million, currently.

Clearly, HMC strategists were of a mind to dip more than a big toe in the alternative-asset waters last quarter. In addition to the sizable gold purchase, the endowment – which had slightly more than $53 billion under management at the conclusion of fiscal year 2024 – bought 1.906 million shares of BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT). Right now, that position is worth roughly $121 million.

Also worth noting are the strategic revisions HMC made to its technology holdings in Q2. The fund reduced its allocations to Alphabet by 10% and Meta by 67%, while dumping its positions in Uber, Rubrik and the Invesco QQQ ETF altogether. At the same time, HMC made significant additions to its positions in select high-profile tech companies, including a 30% increase in its allocation to Nvidia as well as a near-50% increase in Microsoft.

Indeed, HMC’s Microsoft position is now the fund’s largest; 623,000 shares, valued around $317.5 million as of this writing.

Rutgers Professor: “Expanding Money Supply” Likely Driving Investors Such as Harvard Endowment to Seek Out Perceived Stores of Value

As for the substantial positions in gold and bitcoin suddenly taken by the fund, HMC has not publicly addressed its reasons for the allocations…but observers suggest that at least some of the same motivations prompting large institutions to invest in these outside-the-box assets are being felt, as well, by the captains of the endowment.

“Since the money supply has expanded dramatically around the world, especially since the pandemic, some investors are looking at gold and cryptocurrencies as a store of value,” wrote Rutgers Business School Professor John M. Longo in a statement about HMC’s alternative-asset allocations.

As for gold, specifically, it’s hard to imagine the metal’s exceptional record of resilience in recent years has gone unnoticed by HMC fund managers. Since the beginning of 2022, gold has climbed nearly 90%, outperforming conventional assets by a substantial margin. And since January of last year, gold has achieved new all-time highs nearly 70 times.

Ultimately, however, it’s the reasons underpinning these performance numbers which surely lie at the heart of HMC’s decision to buy gold. Rutgers’ Professor Longo referenced intensified currency debasement and its inflationary implications as one. But there are a host of others, including ever-worsening geopolitical tension around the world.

Analysts expect multidimensional global uncertainty – comprised of numerous economic, fiscal and geopolitical factors – to grow further still. Should that happen, it’s reasonable to believe gold…seen by many as the quintessential safe-haven asset…will continue to strengthen.

And that potential (likely?) outcome is something which likely hasn’t escaped the notice of endowment fund managers, either.

This post is created and published for general information purposes only. The Gold Strategist blog disclaims responsibility for any liability or loss incurred as a consequence of the use or application, either directly or indirectly, of any information presented herein. Nothing contained in this post – or any other post featured at this blog – should be construed as a solicitation or recommendation to engage in any financial transaction. You should seek the advice of a qualified professional before making any changes to your personal financial profile.

Economic Week in Review: Powell Signals Rate Cut at Jackson Hole, Fed Minutes Reveal Policymakers’ Continued Inflation Concerns, Good-Looking PMI Data Contains Inflation Warning, and More

Hello, my friends!

Nobody really knew what Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell was going to say prior to his speech on Friday at the central bank’s annual Jackson Hole Symposium. By the time he was finished, however, rate-cut-desperate markets were remarkably energized, euphoric over the chair’s half-hearted suggestion the Fed actually might get back to reducing rates next month.      

After reiterating for the assembled that persistently low unemployment and moderating inflation have enabled Fed officials “to proceed carefully,” Powell delivered the punchline everyone was hoping to hear:

“Nonetheless, with policy in restrictive territory, the baseline outlook and the shifting balance of risks may warrant adjusting our policy stance.”

Still, that was as enthusiastic as Powell got during his speech when it came to embracing the prospect of a September rate cut. Indeed, the chair proceeded cautiously the rest of the way, emphasizing that “it will continue to take time for tariff increases to work their way through supply chains and distribution networks” and adding:

“Moreover, tariff rates continue to evolve, potentially prolonging the adjustment process.”

Nevertheless, Powell’s mere dangling of the possibility that rate cuts may resume was more than enough to set markets off and running. By the close of business on Friday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had soared nearly 850 points to finish up 1.89% on the day. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite was a close second, jumping 1.88%, while the broad-based S&P 500 surged 1.52%.

Powell’s speech, and the market’s reaction TO it, went a long way to offsetting the weakness that had plagued the major indexes in preceding days. The Dow ended the week far and away the best performer of the “big three,” climbing 1.5%. As for the S&P 500, that rose 0.3%. The Nasdaq Composite fell 0.6%.

With so many observers now assuming a rate cut next month is a done deal, all the risks to the market lie squarely to its downside. As Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer at Northlight Asset Management, said on Friday:

“The bar is extremely high now for the Fed to leave rates unchanged in less than a month.”

In other news this week:

Fed Minutes Reveal Policymakers Were More Concerned About Inflation Than Looming Job Weakness Last Month

Exactly one week prior to Wednesday’s reveal of the minutes from the late-July Fed policy meeting, traders had the chances of a rate cut next month pegged at 100%. But shortly after the minutes were published, those odds had dropped to nearly 80%; still reasonably strong…but certainly not reflecting the same degree of confidence projected just days earlier.

So, what was it about the minutes that made traders suddenly less certain about the resumption of rate cuts in September?

Simple: Prevailing concerns among the members of the Federal Open Market Committee that higher inflation may be experiencing a rebirth against the backdrop of volatile White House trade policy.

“Regarding upside risks to inflation, participants pointed to the uncertain effects of tariffs and the possibility of inflation expectations becoming unanchored,” the minutes said.

Ultimately, the committee elected to once again keep the benchmark fed funds rate at the target range of 4.25% to 4.5%, where it’s been since December.

The decision wasn’t unanimous, however. Fed Governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman each preferred to see a rate cut last month, believing the “downside risk to employment the more salient risk.” Notably, it was the first time in more than 30 years that multiple committee members voted against a rate decision.

The minutes indicated that while all policymakers seemed to give looming labor-market weakness a great deal of consideration, “a majority of participants judged the upside risk to inflation as the greater of these two risks.”    

Jerome Powell’s tacit blessing given at Jackson Hole to the possibility of a September rate cut pushed the trader-generated odds we’ll see one back up near 90% by the weekend. But Waller and Bowman aside, a fair number of policymakers – including Powell himself – don’t seem so convinced just yet that tariff-vulnerable inflation will cooperate sufficiently to enable a reduction in rates.

All we – and they – can do is wait to see what sort of data the economy has in store for all of us in the weeks ahead.

S&P Global Flash PMIs Look Good This Month, but Rising Input Prices Suggest More Inflation Trouble Ahead

Also this week, S&P Global reported on Thursday that its Flash U.S. Composite Purchasing Managers Index grew at the fastest rate of the year in August. “Flash” PMIs are advance estimates of the final numbers that come out at the end of each month and are calculated using roughly 85% to 90% of the survey responses.

It turns out the index climbed to an eight-month high this month, rising 0.3 of a percentage point from July to land at 55.4. The metric’s strong showing is one more piece of evidence that U.S. businesses have thrived in the third quarter, despite the ongoing drumbeats warning of a possible downturn.

In fact, not only has overall output resided in expansion territory for 31 straight months, but the measures for July and August represent the strongest back-to-back expansions of output since spring 2022.

The upbeat results this month were driven primarily by the manufacturing sector. Flash U.S. Manufacturing PMI…a critical component of the broader index along with Flash U.S. Services PMI…leapt out of contraction territory this month, surging 3.5 points to come in at 53.3. That’s the highest reading for the manufacturing gauge in more than three years. Services PMI, which has remained above 50 for over two years, ticked down 0.3 of a percentage point this month to 55.4.

The news wasn’t all favorable, however. Businesses across both the manufacturing and services sectors reported the sharpest rise in input prices since May as well as the second-biggest increase in 2½ years.

In a particularly ominous assessment of the outlook for input prices, Chris Williamson, chief business economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence, warned:

“The resulting rise in selling prices for goods and services suggests that consumer price inflation will rise further above the Fed’s 2% target in the coming months. Indeed, combined with the upturn in business activity and hiring, the rise in prices signaled by the survey puts the PMI data more into rate hiking, rather than cutting, territory.

I telegraphed earlier that markets may be getting just a little ahead of themselves with their excitement over near-term rate-cut prospects. The battles now being fought by both goods and services producers to contain input prices is but one more reason to perhaps temper expectations.

Several Data Releases Reveal Housing Market Remains Mired in the Doldrums

Finally this week, we were treated to several updates on the condition of the housing market…each of which left the impression that while things may not be getting any worse in the nation’s residential real estate sector, neither are they improving in any material way.

First up was the Housing Market Index for August, released on Monday by the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB).

According to the data, the index – which measures homebuilder sentiment on a scale of zero to 100 – declined one point this month to come in at 32. Economists had expected the metric to come in at a modestly improved 34.

Since May, the index has remained within a narrow range of 32 and 34, which is the lowest level reached by the metric in 2½ years. What’s more, August marks the 16th month in a row the index has landed below the key level of 50 that distinguishes greater pessimism from greater optimism among homebuilders.

The following day, Tuesday, the Census Bureau reported what at first blush seemed like good news about housing starts last month: New residential construction landed at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.43 million units, which translates to a healthy increase of 5.2% on a monthly basis and 12.9% on an annual basis.

But a more complete review of the Census Bureau’s report suggests last month’s relatively robust activity may not be the beginning of a big turnaround. That’s because the data also showed that permits, which are signs of future construction, sank 2.8% from June and 5.7% year over year.

Additionally, despite the solid move higher last month, housing starts continue to languish at a level more than 20% below where they were three years ago.

Rounding out the week’s housing data were the numbers for existing-home sales in July, released on Thursday by the National Association of Realtors.

The NAR’s report showed that sales of previously owned homes climbed 2% from June, landing at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.01 million units. But while the July result was an improvement over the prior month, sales remain mired at a level nearly 40% below where they were at four years ago.

As for the culprits of the overall anemic numbers, they haven’t changed.  

“Affordability continues to be the top challenge for the housing market and buyers are waiting for mortgage rates to drop to move forward,” said NAHB Chairman Buddy Hughes, a home builder and developer from Lexington, N.C.

That’s all for now; have a great weekend!

This post is created and published for general information purposes only. The Gold Strategist blog disclaims responsibility for any liability or loss incurred as a consequence of the use or application, either directly or indirectly, of any information presented herein. Nothing contained in this post – or any other post featured at this blog – should be construed as a solicitation or recommendation to engage in any financial transaction. You should seek the advice of a qualified professional before making any changes to your personal financial profile

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑